Common Questions from the Public
This Wild Horse and Burro Program receives many questions on a day-to-day basis from members of the public and stakeholders who are engaged in the management of wild horses and burros on public lands. Below are answers to common questions based on e-mails and phone calls that the BLM receives at its National Wild Horse and Burro Information Center.
Additional information can be found on the Myths and Facts page.
- Supplemental feeding?
Question: Why doesn't the BLM provide supplemental feed to wild horses and burros when resources are scarce, rather than gathering and removing them?
Answer: BLM is committed to managing healthy wild horse and burro herds in an ecologically sustainable way. This involves maintaining herd populations that are in balance with the land, including through periodic removals and humane population growth suppression (e.g. fertility control). Providing supplemental feed to wild horses and burros on the range where herd sizes exceed the carrying capacity of the land – due to scarcity of forage or other limiting factors – can actually be counterproductive. By supporting a population that’s already too large for available natural resources, the result would be even more severe overgrazing and longer lasting impacts to the land. Supplemental feeding herds can also cause localized resource impacts by compacting soil, increasing erosion and disrupting water sources for wildlife. The influence that supplemental feeding can have on the animals’ wild free-roaming behavior is also a concern, as they can easily become habituated to human interventions. For these reasons, supplemental feeding is not among the principal management tools BLM uses to achieve its goal of healthy herds on healthy rangelands.
- Control for Overpopulation?
Question: It has been said that BLM is not gathering herds of wild horses often enough, leading to overpopulation on the range? Does the agency believe it's conducting gathers at a reasonable rate to control for overpopulation?
Answer: The BLM takes action where it can to reduce overpopulation and put the Wild Horse and Burro Program on track toward having healthy herds on healthy rangelands, while also using taxpayer resources responsibly. The BLM aims to gather wild horses and burros from areas on public lands where the highest concerns exist when it comes to protecting animal health, saving critical wildlife habitat and protecting public safety by removing animals from highways and private property.
The BLM also launched new initiatives to find more private homes for the wild horses and burros removed from public lands, including offering financial incentives to adopt animals and providing a better way to adopt online. The BLM continues to invest in research for better fertility control, supporting public-private partnerships for training and adopting out more animals and moving more animals to cost-effective off-range pastures for long-term care. Through all these actions, the BLM continues to work with Congress, our partners and the public to reduce overpopulation across the West.
- Gathers vs. Fertility Control?
Question: Some claim that helicopter gathers are inhumane and fertility control methods are a better way to control overpopulation on the range. Does the BLM use PZP and other fertility drugs on horses on the range?
Answer: The claim that gathers are inhumane is patently false. The BLM's helicopter-assisted gathers are conducted humanely, as most recently affirmed by a peer-reviewed scientific review of BLM gathers, as reported in The Horse: Your Guide to Equine Health Care. BLM gathers have proven to be more humane, effective, and efficient than other types of gather methods when large numbers of animals need to be removed over wide areas or rugged terrain, and they lead to lower rates of injury and mortality than comparable capture operations for native big game species.
The BLM has supported the development of fertility control for wild horses for several decades, and the BLM continues to support the use of fertility control methods in herds where it can be effective in slowing or stabilizing growth. Typically, the fertility control vaccines currently available are most effective at controlling growth rates in herds that are already at or near target population size and where animals can be located, approached and darted. However, because many herds are found in remote and rugged areas of public lands, sometimes roaming over hundreds of thousands of acres with current herd sizes that are far over the desired levels, remote darting in most HMAs is not practical and additional gathers would be needed to administer fertility control methods.
The BLM continues to seek ways to use fertility control more broadly and more effectively, and we continue to support research to develop new and longer-lasting fertility control vaccines. Available fertility-control treatments like Porcine Zona Pellucida are only effective at preventing pregnancy in wild mares for 1-2 years. For areas where animals are not approachable, the biggest expense comes from the need for the BLM to gather twice as many animals as those treated (50 percent of the population are mares and only about 90 percent of those are of treatable age).
Capitalizing on the agency’s successful research and development efforts, the BLM has been increasing its use of Gonacon, a longer-term vaccine that can prevent pregnancy for 4-5 years in animals that receive two doses. The BLM has also recently started to use soft, flexible silicone intrauterine devices (IUDs) to limit fertility, as those have been shown to be safe and effective. As part of a sustained fertility control program, the BLM supports humane methods of sterilizing some wild horses and burros as a method of slowing population growth and reducing the need for gathers. Sterilizing some wild horses in herds where it’s infeasible to use short-lasting fertility control treatments is supported by the American Association of Equine Practitioners and American Veterinary Medical Association – two of the largest equine veterinarian associations in the world
- Adoption Incentive Program pitfalls?
Question: Does the Adoption Incentive Program encourage people to adopt wild horses or burros just to receive the $1,000 incentive payment then sell the animals to slaughter once they receive title?”
Answer: The BLM initiated the Adoption Incentive Program to encourage more adopters to give a wild horse or burro a good home. The up to $1,000 incentive is available for approved adopters and all untrained wild horses and burros, including animals at BLM facilities, off-site events and the Online Corral. As with all wild horse and burro adoptions since the program began decades ago, adopted animals can become the property of adopters after a year, through a process in which title to the animal is passed to the adopter. BLM does not have the means or legal authority to track or direct the disposition of wild horses or burros once they pass into private ownership (i.e. once an animal is sold by BLM or an adopter receives title).
If/when BLM becomes aware of freeze marked animals arriving at commercial sale barns, the agency will conduct its due diligence to ensure the animals are in fact properly titled or sold. If they are not properly titled or sold, they remain subject to BLM’s jurisdiction under the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act. The agency will move to repossess such animals, investigate the matter and take appropriate legal or administrative action. It is important to note that BLM does not and cannot assume that any or every titled or sold wild horse or burro that arrives at a sale barn is destined for slaughter. Indeed, many such animals are acquired from sale barns by equine welfare organizations or by private individuals. BLM strongly encourages anyone who has the means and desire to adopt or purchase a wild horse or burro to avail themselves of the many opportunities at any of BLM’s facilities, events or Online Corral.
- Too many animals adopted?
Question: Does the Adoption Incentive Program encourage groups of people, like families, to adopt more animals than they otherwise would be allowed to?
Answer: The requirements for adopting under the Adoption Incentive Program (AIP) are identical to those for traditional (non-AIP) adoptions. Individuals are limited to holding no more than four untitled animals at any single location; also, an individual may receive title to no more than four animals in a single year. It is permissible for multiple individuals – including members of the same family – to adopt and care for up to four animals each at the same location (such as a boarding facility), so long as all other requirements for animal care at that location are met (e.g. minimum square footage). Unless BLM has evidence that an individual or group of individuals has conspired to evade these requirements (say by falsifying one or more adoption applications), there is no actionable violation of the regulations. If any such violation does occur, BLM can and will take appropriate action, which can include repossessing animals and/or issuing a decision letter barring the individual(s) from participating in the adoption program in the future. More serious actions can be taken – including referral for criminal prosecution – if circumstances warrant.
- Qualified Adopters?
Question: How does the BLM determine if an adopter is on the “up and up” and the adopted animal is not destined for a slaughterhouse in Canada or Mexico?
Answer: The BLM screens potential adopters alongside a list of individuals that have been determined to be ineligible. All animals adopted from BLM are subject to inspection by BLM specialists prior to being titled. This is to ensure that the adopter is complying with all requirements of their Private Maintenance and Care Agreement (PMACA) relating to animal welfare/wellbeing. Where deficiencies are found, BLM works with the adopter to correct them. If compliance is not or cannot be attained, the adopter will either voluntarily relinquish the animal back to BLM or BLM will repossess the animal. In the latter case, if a determination is made that an adopter violated any of the Prohibited Acts outlined in their PMACA, the agency may issue a Decision Letter that would render them ineligible to participate in the adoption program in the future. Certain violations – such as selling/transferring animals prior to receiving title – may also be referred to BLM Law Enforcement for investigation and, from there, potentially to the appropriate U.S. Attorney who may exercise discretion whether or not to prosecute.
- National Wild Horse and Advisory Board recommendation?
Question: What is the BLM's response to the recommendation made by the National Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board on September 9, 2016, to sell without limitation or humanely euthanize excess horses and burros in BLM's off-range corrals and pastures that are deemed "unadoptable"?
Answer: The National Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board is an independent panel comprised of members of the public that make recommendations to the Bureau of Land Management regarding its management of wild horses and burros. The BLM is committed to having healthy horses on healthy rangelands. We will continue to care for and seek good homes for animals that have been removed from the range. The agency continues to seek new and better tools for managing the nation's quickly expanding population of wild horses. There are nearly 95,000 wild horses and burros on public lands in the West -- three times the recommended level -- and nearly 45,000 additional horses and burros that have been removed from the range and are available for adoption. We encourage those who might be interested in adopting one of these incredible animals to call 1-866-4MUSTANGS.
- Shade Structures at Palomino Valley?
Question: As of July 1, 2016, what is the current status on shade at Palomino Valley Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Center (PVC) outside of Reno, Nevada?
Answer: 4/5/17 Update:
The first section of new windbreaks have been installed at the Palomino Valley Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Center.
Eventually, new windbreaks will be installed in all 10 perimeter pens at the facility, and overhang roofs will be constructed off the top of each panel to provide additional shade for animals at the corral. These new shelter structures will provide additional comfort to animals at the facility as BLM works to find homes for them.
As part of the annual maintenance and repair efforts at the Palomino Valley Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Center (PVC), the BLM has upgraded two existing and installed four new shade structures in pens housing wild horses and burros. In addition, the BLM plans to purchase and install new structures to provide shade and shelter from the wind in four perimeter pens capable of holding up to 500 horses. Beyond these installations, the BLM is committed to working with its partners to pursue further renovations at the PVC.
- Substantive Comments?
Question: Does the BLM count or treat identical or similar comments received during its environmental-review process as a single comment?
Answer: The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has established regulations concerning the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, which Federal agencies such as the BLM are required to follow. CEQ also provides guidance for interpreting NEPA regulations. In one such memorandum, "Forty Most Asked Questions Concerning CEQ's National Environmental Policy Act Regulations," question 29a addresses the subject of comment responses:
If a number of comments are identical or very similar, agencies may group the comments and prepare a single answer for each group. Comments may be summarized if they are especially voluminous…
All substantive comments are an important part of the BLM's NEPA process.
Substantive comments do one or more of the following:
- question, with reasonable basis, the accuracy of information in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or Environmental Assessment (EA);
- question, with reasonable basis, the adequacy of, methodology for, or assumptions used for the environmental analysis;
- present new information relevant to the analysis;
- present reasonable alternatives other than those analyzed in the EIS or EA; and
- cause changes or revisions in one or more of the alternatives.
It should be noted that the BLM, which welcomes public input, is not required to respond to non-substantive comments, such as those merely expressing approval or disapproval of a proposal without reason, as the opportunity to comment is not a voting exercise.
- Animals moved to different facilities?
Question: Does the BLM ever move animals from a long-term pasture to another holding facility? If so, why?
Answer: Yes, BLM moves animals from long-term pastures to other facilities if the long-term pasture can no longer accommodate the animals.
Examples of when this would occur include:
- If a contractor sells the ranch and the new owner does not want to manage for wild horses.
- If a contractor has lands recovering from a natural disaster such as drought or flood and wants to remove grazing animals or decrease their numbers to aid in recovery.
- If, at the end of a contract period, market conditions change in the livestock sector such that the contractor identifies a more lucrative use for the land.
Depending on the capacity of the facility needing to relocate animals, the number of animals being relocated can range from a few hundred to a few thousand head.
The majority of animals that have not been adopted are held on long-term pastures. Long-term pastures provide a free-roaming environment for the animals and it costs less for the taxpayer to house animals on long-term pastures than at short-term holding facilities. With long-term and short-term facilities nearly filled to capacity, the BLM is currently seeking new off-range corral and pasture facilities.
- BLM's response to Inspector General Report?
Question: What is the BLM's reaction to an Inspector General report regarding horse sales to Tom Davis of Colorado?
Answer: The Bureau of Land Management is committed to improving the health and management of wild horses and burros on federal lands in the West. We take very seriously the findings of the July 7, 2015, Department of the Interior Inspector General Report involving Mr. Davis and the events that occurred in 2012.
In response to these events, the Bureau of Land Management immediately implemented a policy to ensure that horses were sold only to good homes, including limits of four horses over a six-month period to a single buyer. This policy has helped the Bureau of Land Management avoid situations similar to those involving Mr. Davis by ensuring that purchasers provide appropriate care and facilities for the animals.
- Read a freeze mark?
If you still cannot read the freeze mark, please contact the BLM's National WH&B Information Center at 866-468-7826 or e-mail your question to email@example.com. If you can submit a photo of the freeze mark, that will assist us in providing you with accurate information.
- Confirm title status?
Question: I have acquired a BLM-titled wild horse or burro, but do not have any paperwork. I would like to confirm its title status and learn more about the animal. Where do I start?
Answer: Please contact the BLM's National WH&B Information Center at 866-468-7826 or e-mail your question to firstname.lastname@example.org. We will need the freeze mark information to confirm the title status and history of the animal.
- Transfer title?
Question: I have acquired a BLM-titled wild horse or burro. I would like to have the title transferred into my name. What do I do?
Answer: The BLM cannot reissue the title to a new owner; however, the BLM can send you an official letter providing the title date and history of the animal. Please contact the BLM's National WH&B Information Center at 866-468-7826 or e-mail your question to email@example.com. The Center can connect you with the BLM office of jurisdiction that will send you the official letter.