Bitterroot Range, Montana
BLM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Coal Mining, Wyoming Geothermal Power Plant, California Oil 'Donkey', New Mexico Solar Energy Panel, Unknown Wind Turbines, Palm Springs, CA
National
BLM>Energy>Oil and Gas>RDAWP Home>Business Process
Print Page

Business Process

The purpose of the Remote Data Acquisition for Well Production (RDAWP) Project is to provide automated tools to support and further enable the BLM’s Inspection and Enforcement (I&E) of all oil & gas production on federal lands as required  by The Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management and National Energy Policy Acts. The BLM’s Oil and Gas I&E program needs to improve production inspections in ways involving electronic records. BLM needs accurate and timely production data to ensure production data validation across the board. The RDAWP project acquires near-real-time well production data and then validates the production data for use by BLM Staff. The RDAWP Project will make the production data validation process considerably more efficient for BLM and the affected Operators and Producers who must provide well production-related data in response to BLM requests.  
 
The current BLM production validation process is performed by Petroleum Engineering Technicians (PETs) and Production Accountability Technicians (PATs) and Operator/Producer personnel as illustrated and described in the following steps below.
 
Step 1 - The Operator, Producer, or Transporter typically uses a wide variety of commercially available Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems to automate the monitoring and control of a wide variety of Electronic Flow Meters (EFM) for production measurement at a producing well or at a production sales facility. A wide variety of production data information is collected using such technology located remotely in the field. The SCADA systems acquire raw data from the EFM by radio telemetry using non-standardized and standardized data exchange format(s) and then stores production data in SCADA supporting databases. This data is subsequently selected and edited by industry production reporting systems or personnel prior to submitting production data reports to the Mineral Management Service (MMS) and State government agencies as required by regulation. This step is a field production data acquisition process; data editing process when necessary; and subsequent submission of production reporting data to regulatory agencies, respectively.
 
Step 2 - During BLM’s production validation process, BLM I&E personnel use MMS production data report information as an initial validation record baseline. When necessary, BLM may then issue a formal request for specific production data to an Operator or Producer for a federal lease or production agreement for a specified timeframe. A formal production data request may encompass from one to hundreds of wells and a span from one month to six years. Requests for data are by federal case number and are typically based on FOGRMA requirements including but not limited to well volume produced, compliance history, special request, and/or random sampling basis. This step is mandated by FOGRMA and currently is a significant workload challenge for BLM to ensure Federal production accountability.
 
Step 3 - The Operator then conducts two actions simultaneously. The Operator compiles paper records from their electronic SCADA and other systems covering the period in question. The Operator also requests attendant records for the same timeframe from the Producer or Transporter. As an example, one large case involving many wells can require the compilation of thousands of pages of information. Operator personnel then collate all of the information, ensure that each page is labeled with the appropriate BLM identifier (case number, lease identifier, or API number), and ship the pages to the appropriate BLM office. This step is a very labor intensive, time-consuming, and costly operation to industry.
 
Step 4 - Once the paperwork reaches the BLM office, I&E personnel (PATs and PETs) perform an initial review of the hard copy documentation to ensure completeness as compared to the original request. PETs and PATs then conduct a detailed review of each document, looking for errors, inconsistencies, and violations of measurement standards. It is often necessary to then issue additional letters requesting more information to complete the data set and/or have PETs perform a field inspection of the related well(s). More often than not the evaluated well data returns production validation results that appear to be in agreement with the data submitted to MMS (OGOR) with the conclusion that the production appears to be properly measured and accounted for. The amount of time required to conduct a field inspection varies depending on the well’s physical location and complexity of well and production facility infrastructure. Under current procedures, the PETs and PATs perform manual calculations using custom techniques and tools such as spreadsheets and/or pen and paper. As with Step 3 this function is a labor intensive, time-consuming, prone to error, and costly operation to the government and industry.
 
Step 5 - The results of the inspection are then compiled and discussed with the Operator. Should the Operator be unable to provide required, additional support documentation, BLM will notify the Operator and MMS of the corrected volumes and quality.Incidents of Non-Compliance (INC) and subsequent enforcement actions may also be performed. Otherwise, the Operator provides additional supporting documentation and the process repeats from the detailed review and analysis performed by the PETs and PATs. As above, another time consuming and costly operation to both the government and industry.
 
The proposed RDAWP project will largely provide an automated, secure means to retrieve production verification information using automated reports and validation tools using historical and real-time production data from an operator’s or producer’s automated production monitoring systems. The benefits to both government and industry vice the 5 Step process listed above will be immediate in both time and cost savings. Additionally, once the production data has been validated, then authorized stakeholders located downstream of production can access the validated production data in support of their mandated reporting and royalty management missions in a more efficient and timely manner.
 
                           Current Business Process Flow (without automation support)
 
Figure 1 . Current Business Process Flow (without automation support)
Click for Larger Image
 
Figure 2 shows the future business process with the incorporation of RDAWP automation. The primary differences lie in the automated push of well production data to the RDAWP server, automatic performance of flow calculations by RDAWP, and the presentation of well data out of tolerance through alarms. The introduction of an alarming capability allows the I&E inspector to focus his efforts on specific wells. Under the legacy process, the inspector must evaluate several additional wells, most of which are producing correct production data.
 
The improved efficiency to the business process is apparent through the introduction of automation. The processed results and raw data are available and up-to-date over the Internet, when needed, instead of waiting for Operator accountants and BLM personnel to process and distribute the data.

                              Business Process Flow with Automation Support (without automation support)

  Figure 2 . Business Process Flow with Automation Support (without automation support)
Click for Larger Image

The introduction of RDAWP supports automated data processing and the creation of numerous individual custom spreadsheets and processes to perform production accountability. RDAWP uses commercial software and a commercial Data Service Provider to access the raw production data and provide both the data and calculated results to authorized users.