Cabezon Creek WSA, NM
BLM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Railroad Valley Oil Well, Battle Mountain NV Antelope in New Mexico Arrow-leaf balsam root in Montana Wind Turbine Fire Management Officer in Eugene, OR
BLM>Socioeconomic Impacts>Grazing
Print Page

Socioeconomic Impacts from Grazing

Grazing on BLM lands made possible the introduction of $310 million worth of feed and fiber into the market.  Overall, BLM-administered lands provided $540 million in grazing-related benefits and supported more than 4,100 jobs in Fiscal Year 2010.  This table provides employment and economic output in each state.  Economic output data are in millions of dollars.


SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS
Energy
Recreation
Timber
Grazing


State

Employment

Output ($million)

 

Direct

Total

Direct

Total

Alaska

0

0

0.0

0.0

Arizona

100

191

14.3

27.4

California

34

71

5.1

11.9

Colorado

194

336

28.3

53.5

Eastern States

0

0

0.0

0.0

Idaho

212

 402

 35.8

 61.8

Kansas

 0

 0

 0.0

 0.0

Montana

 239

 438

 32.9

 59.7

Nebraska

 0

 0

 0.0

 0.0

Nevada

 200

 352

 34.6

 58.1

New Mexico

 486

 842

 70.1

 117.3

North Dakota

 1

 2

 0.3

 0.4

Oklahoma

 0

 0

 0.0

 0.0

Oregon

 216

 388

 17.5

 36.4

South Dakota

 17

 28

 3.2

 5.0

Texas

 0

 0

 0.0

 0.0

Utah

 360

 476

 22.0

 36.1

Washington

 21

 33

 1.5

 3.2

Wyoming

 426

 623

 44.7

 69.5

Sum of States

 2,507

4,181

310.3

540.3

National1

 2,507

 4,181

310.3

540.3

1National grazing impacts cannot be calculated due to technical limitations.  Statewide totals are substituted.

About These Numbers

Data in the "Direct" column are an estimate of the BLM's economic contribution to local economies in terms of employment and other economic benefits directly associated with BLM-managed lands and resources.  These benefits might be associated with river guides and other recreation outfitters, for example.  Data in the "Total" column for each category of BLM activity demonstrate the agency's impacts, including indirect and induced benefits with, for instance, companies that manufacture outdoor gear and local service businesses in gateway communities.

National numbers may be larger than the sum of individual state numbers because the national number accounts for activity across state lines.  For example, machinery production in California might be used to support mining activity in Wyoming.  Employment benefits reflect an annual average for full- and part-time private sector jobs.  Table totals may not add exactly, because of rounding.  The data are preliminary and are subject to change based on further review.

Available for Download

Thumbnail of BLM report coverA PDF version of the March 2011 publication, "A Sound Investment for America," is available for download at http://blm.gov/4q5c.  The Department of the Interior's June 2011 economic report incorporates economic data on hardrock minerals that are not included in the BLM report.