| The growing, changing West
The public lands, once considered remote and of little value, are
now one of the last-remaining guarantees of open space. In 1945,
one year before the BLM became an agency, the West’s population
stood at about 17 million. Today, more than 63 million people live
in the West, and the growth is expected to continue. When NEPA and
FLPMA were passed more than 25 years ago, few anticipated this dramatic
growth and the increasing demands it would place on the public lands.
Critical to the success of multiple use land management is creative
and cooperative management. With over 22 million people living within
25 miles of the public lands, the BLM can only be effective by working
closely with local and state governments and the private sector.
Through close collaboration and partnerships, the BLM determines
how best to manage these lands so as to meet the needs of both Western
communities and the Nation as a whole.
As part of its work to support local communities, the BLM must
significantly strengthen and update its land-use plans—the
backbone of the process needed to make sound resource decisions.
These plans, which are prepared with extensive public involvement,
are intended to identify the current condition of the land, appropriate
uses of its resources, and the public's needs and desires. Most
of the BLM's land-use plans were completed at least a decade ago.
Because of the rapid pace of change in the West and the recent expansion
of communities into rural areas, these plans need to be updated,
as they no longer reflect current on-the-ground conditions or do
not adequately address the public's emerging needs.
As the West has changed over the past two decades, so have the
demands and expectations of public lands administered by the BLM.
With changing local economies, rapid population growth, shifting
demographics, and the expansion of residential areas into lands
once considered remote, the western United States represents an
environment where BLM lands are often the center of both conflict
and opportunity.
The need for Updated Land Use Plans
Accurate, up-to-date land use plans are integral to effective management
of America’s public lands administered by the BLM. Land use
plans and planning decisions are the basis for every action the
BLM takes and serve as its primary tool for building consensus and
providing the public a voice in our land and resource management
programs.
To keep pace with the public’s demands for a variety of uses
on the public lands, current land use plans are essential to addressing
new management challenges and providing good customer service to
public land users. Land use plans provide the basis for sound and
legally defensible resource decisions.
Most of BLM’s LUPs were completed in the 1980s and early
1990s. As a result of changing resource and socio-economic conditions,
increased demand for energy and other minerals, evolving land use
patterns, and technological advancements, these plans are becoming
increasingly outdated. As a consequence, many plans no longer provide
the management guidance needed to process land use authorizations
and are increasingly subject to legal challenges. Some plans do
not address new environmental standards or congressional, judicial,
or administrative mandates. For example, Congress has designated
14 National Conservation Areas and a National Monument, and a number
of new National Monuments have been established by Presidential
proclamation; all of these areas need new plans. Recent legislation
has withdrawn public lands for six military reservations in Alaska,
Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico, requiring new land use plans or
plan revisions.
As requested by Congress, the Bureau included in its fiscal year
2001 budget request the results of an ongoing analysis of the status
of land use planning and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
adequacy and the actions needed to correct identified deficiencies,
including the level of funding and other resources that would be
required. These findings were documented in the “Report
to Congress - Land Use Planning for Sustainable Resource Decisions”,
completed and submitted to Congress in February 2000. The Bureau
realized a budget increase of $19 Million for FY 2001 consistent
with this report to Congress. Long-term Bureau funding needs in
planning are projected to be $50 million per year.
In the report, the Bureau identified a total of 162 existing land-use
plans and associated NEPA analyses covering most of the 262 million
acres of public lands that the BLM administers. Some of these plans
are current, but many are older-generation plans dating back to
the 1970s. A number of these earlier plans, as well as some of the
more current plans, do not adequately meet the new demands and mandates
that have emerged:
- Changing demographics, pace of change is accelerating (rapid population
growth in the West)
- Rural/urban interface issues
- Old plans are outdated and ineffective
- Listing of new threatened and endangered species
- Few trained planners within BLM
- New Land Use Planning Handbook
- New planning approaches and techniques
- Pressure to complete plans in less time
- Interest in collaborative, landscape-based plans
- Opportunities for “on-the-ground” management based on
plans
- Designation of National Monuments and National Conservation Areas
As a result of plan deficiencies, shortfalls in the emerging areas,
and conflicting public uses, the Bureau faces increased litigation.
It is imperative that land-use plans are updated not only to comply
with judicial decisions and meet the demands of these emerging issues
and shortfalls, but also to meet the nation’s energy and minerals
needs while preserving and protecting other public land resources.
Time Sensitive Plans
The BLM is committed to updating its entire planning base. In particular,
the agency has identified 21 “Time Sensitive Plans”
that merit immediate attention in addressing high priority issues.
The BLM is moving quickly to develop these 21 land use plans, and,
in order to ensure the success of this initiative, will continue
to increase coordination and consultation with the public, local
and national interest groups, state government, and Congress. BLM
is developing compressed project schedules, implementing efficiencies
in processes, and dedicating financial resources. The BLM is directing
its resources toward completing these critical plans within the
next three years to address the most urgently needed plan revisions
and amendments.
The Time Sensitive Plans (TSPs) address a number of complex issues,
including:
- Increasing demands on the wildland-urban interface in the rapidly
urbanizing West, including recreation and open space;
- Growing numbers of listed and candidate species;
- Increased demands for domestic energy supply, new mineral extraction
technologies, and the need for a modernization of energy transmission
infrastructure;
- The need to plan for fire management; and
- New Congressional and Administrative designations of National Conservation
Areas, National Monuments, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Areas, Wild
and Scenic Rivers, and National Scenic and Historic Trails.
The table below lists the twenty-one Time Sensitive Plans, as well
as the planning lead contacts. For more information on the TSP initiative,
please visit the BLM home page and check out our newsletters: http://www.blm.gov/planning/handouts/tsp_news.htm
| Plan Name and Location |
Completion Date |
Major Issues |
Planning Lead |
| National Petroleum Reserve Alaska NW (AK) |
November 2003 |
Oil and gas |
Mike Kleven, 907-474-2317 |
| Las Cienegas National Conservation Area (AZ) |
July 2003 |
Riparian |
Karen Simms, 520-258-7210 |
| North & East Colorado Desert Amendment
(CA Desert) |
December 2002 (completed) |
lawsuit requirement, includes
T&E species, burros |
Dick Crowe, 909-697-5216 |
| North & East Mojave Desert Amendment (CA
Desert) |
December 2002 (completed) |
lawsuit requirement, includes
T&E species, recreation |
Edyth Seehafer, 760-252-6021 |
| West Mojave Desert Amendment (CA Desert) |
July 2003 |
lawsuit requirement, includes
T&E species, recreation |
Bill Haigh,
760-252-6080 |
| Imperial Sand Dunes (CA) |
October 2003 |
lawsuit requirement, includes
T&E species, OHV |
Roxie Trost, 760-337-4420 |
| Santa Rosa National Monument (CA) |
October 2003 |
legislative requirement, T&E
species, wilderness |
Connell Dunning,
760-251-4817 |
| Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area
(CO) |
June 2004 |
legislative requirement; wilderness,
recreation |
Jane Ross,
970-244-3000 |
| Roan Plateau (CO) |
May 2004 |
oil & gas leasing impacts,
legislative requirement |
Greg Goodenow, 970-947-2900 |
| Gunnison Gorge National Conservation Area
(CO) |
November 2003 |
legislative requirement, recreation,
wilderness |
Bill Bottomly, 970-240-5337 |
| Powder River / Billings (MT) |
April 2003 (completed) |
oil & gas, coalbed methane |
Mary Bloom, 406-233-3649 |
| Farmington (NM) |
July 2003 |
oil & gas, T&E species,
other uses |
Jim Ramakka, 505-599-6307 |
| Black Rock-High Rock Desert National Conservation
Area (NV) |
November 2003 |
legislative requirement; recreation,
wilderness |
Ester Hutchison, 775-623-1500 |
| Steens CMPA (OR) |
October 2004 |
legislative requirement, wilderness,
OHV |
Gary Foulkes, 541-573-4541 |
| Price (UT) |
September 2004 |
oil & gas, coalbed methane,
OHV, recreation, wilderness |
Floyd Johnson, 435-636-3600 |
| Vernal (UT) |
October 2004 |
multiple issues, including
oil & gas, T&E species, OHV |
Dave Moore, 435-781-4467 |
| Jack Morrow Hills (WY) |
September 2004 |
multiple issues |
Renee Dana, 307-352-0227 |
| Buffalo/ Powder River (WY) |
April 2003 (completed) |
multiple issues, including
oil & gas, coalbed methane, T&E species |
Paul Beels, 307-684-1168 |
| Snake River (WY) |
December 2003 |
no existing plan; multiple
issues |
Kellie Roadifer, 307-367-5309 |
| Pinedale (WY) |
October 2004 |
multiple issues, including
oil & gas, coalbed methane, urban interface |
Kellie Roadifer, 307-367-5309 |
| Rawlins (Great Divide) (WY) |
October 2004 |
multiple issues, including
oil & gas, coalbed methane, urban interface |
John Spehar, 307-328-4264 |
|