Table R-2. Summary of Environmental Consequences By Alternative
| Alternatives | |||||||||
| Effects | NA1 | A | B | C | D | E | RMP 2 | ||
| Air Quality (tons of fuel
burned3 annually in prescribed fires, 10 years). |
85,000 | 91,000 | 80,000 | 96,000 | 165,000 | 276,000 | 102,000 | ||
| Water Quality (10 years)4 | |||||||||
| Number of analytical watersheds probably improving5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Number of analytical watersheds probably declining | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Dominant Woodpecker
Populations (percentage of potential, 10 years). |
54 | 45 | 46 | 53 | 61 | 57 | 52 | ||
| Visual Resources (10 years)6 | |||||||||
| VRM Class I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | ||
| VRM Class II | 0 | - | - | 0 | + | + | + | ||
| VRM Class III | 0 | - | - | 0 | + | + | + | ||
| VRM Class IV | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | N/A | + | ||
| Wild and Scenic Rivers (study river segments, 10 years) | |||||||||
| Miller Creek (Scenic outstandingly remarkable value) | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | ||
| Barnes Valley Creek | |||||||||
| Fish outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Scenic outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | ||
| Spencer Creek | |||||||||
| Fish outstandingly remarkable value | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | ||
| Scenic outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | + | + | ||
| Antelope Creek-segment A (Prehistoric) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | ||
| Antelope Creek-segment C (Prehistoric) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | ||
| Upper Klamath River-segment 2 | |||||||||
| Historic outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | ||
| Prehistoric outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | + | + | ||
| Recreation outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | - | - | 0 | + | + | + | ||
| Scenic outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | + | + | ||
| Fish outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Wildlife outstandingly remarkable value | 0 | - | - | 0 | + | + | + | ||
| Native American Traditional Use | 0 | - | - | 0 | + | + | + | ||
Table R-2. Summary of Environmental Consequences By Alternative (Continued)
| Alternatives | |||||||||
| Effects | NA1 | A | B | C | D | E | RMP 2 | ||
| Recreation Use (capability to meet ten-year demand)7 | |||||||||
| Off-road travel | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes8 | ||
| Nonmotorized travel | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Camping | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Picnicking, studying nature, etc. | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Boating | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Swimming, general waterplay | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Timber | |||||||||
| Annual long term sustained yield capacity (mmcf) | |||||||||
| West Side | 3.423 | 2.483 | 2.103 | 0.791 | 1.674 | 0.182 | 1.028 | ||
| East Side | 0.270 | 0.267 | 0.249 | 0.226 | 0.248 | 0.004 | 0.078 | ||
| Socioeconomic Conditions (10 years) | |||||||||
| Planning area jobs dependent
on BLM timber production. |
170 | 130 | 110 | 40 | 90 | 10 | 40 | ||
| Planning area jobs dependent
on recreation on BLM administered lands. |
20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | ||
| Planning area annuals
personal income dependent on BLM timber production ($ million, 1989 Dollars). |
3.397 | 2.508 | 2.124 | 0.801 | 1.697 | 0.184 | 0.789 | ||
| Planning area annual
personal income dependent on recreation on BLM-administered lands ($ million). |
0.219 | 0.219 | 0.230 | 0.238 | 0.212 | 0.212 | 0.238 | ||
| Average annual O&C
receipts distributed to all counties ($ million). |
130.00 | 169.42 | 154.19 | 48.11 | 54.15 | 39.69 | 25.77 | ||
| Grazing (percentage of change). | 0 | +24 | +3 | -8 | -16 | -29 | -5 | ||
1 NA = No Action |
|||||||||