NO. 7 DATE 06/09/99
by Jacek Blaszczynski, Physical Scientist, National Applied Resource Sciences Center (NARSC)
Models are essentially simplified views of the processes that we know to occur in Nature. They often rely on several important environmental parameters relevant to the process being analyzed and a simple "engine" which relates these parameters to each other. For example, the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) model relies on six primary parameters which reflect the influence on sheet and rill erosion of rainfall intensity; soil erodibility; slope gradient; slope length; surface cover; and erosion control practice factors. The values for each of the factors are either measured or calculated and fit into an equation developed from statistical analysis of 104 plot years of cropland studies. The USLE model was also modified for rangeland applications to create the RUSLE, or the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation. The USLE and the RUSLE are empirical models because their "engine" is generated from statistical analyses of a large number of actual experimental results. Other model "engines" might work differently; for example, calculating runoff values based on hydrologic equations. Since models are essentially nothing more than their "engine" and environmental data, they are uniquely adaptable to being automated on computers. Then they can be used to analyze large amounts of data that otherwise could not be easily reviewed.
Whoever utilizes models has to be aware that they probably will not predict unique ecological circumstances that can be found on a specific parcel of land but provide knowledge-based predictions of the magnitude of the likely processes that should be occuring in that area. The accuracy of these predictions is directly dependent on the quality of data. The most honest description of modeled information is to present it as a result of a certain logic and environmental data combined using this logic even in choosing our sampling methods we are already modeling because we are conceptualizing what and how specific parameters should be measured. A model can be understood as a painting of reality done with a limited number of colors which should not be confused with reality itself.
Taking account of these facts, NARSC is currently engaged in combining various GIS functions and tools into models to aid following ecosystem analysis efforts.
This project is combining watershed delineation and watershed morphometric parameter analysis technology to derive similar areas based on shape of terrain. It is understood that particularly in high relief locations the shape of terrain has profound impact on geomorphic, hydrologic, and other ecosystem processes. Therefore, subdivision of the land surface according to terrain characteristics should aid in finding transitional zones in terrain and local ecosystems. The methods involve division of the project into mini-watersheds associated with individual reaches of a stream network. The morphology of each mini-basin is analyzed using morphometric parameters that describe each basin. The basin morphometric parameter values are then grouped to indicate which of the mini-watersheds are morphologically similar to each other. Morphologically similar watersheds are grouped in clusters that represent similar terrain characteristics within the project area. The morphologically similar areas outlined by groups of analogous watersheds can be used to study ecologic processes influenced by terrain shape. These include the ecosystem processes of soil erosion and sediment yield, surface and subsurface hydrology, solar irradiation, and evapotranspiration.
Terrain analysis tools are directly utilizable in development of GIS interfaces to erosion, runoff, and sediment yield models to aid prediction of the patterns of these processes on large areas. One of the main difficulties with application of soil erosion prediction tools such as the RUSLE has to do with being able to adequately account for terrain variability in the modeled area. Various terrain analysis capabilities, including basic watershed and flow delineation methods, can be utilized to improve the predictive capability of RUSLE by permitting measurement of this variability. Beyond that data integration capabilities of GIS permit rapid analysis of terrain, soil, and vegetation data together to develop basin and Hydrologic Response Unit (HRU) statistics required for running of the National Resource Conservation Service Curve Number (NRCS CN) watershed runoff model and Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) for watershed sediment yield prediction. All of these models help us to identify land management measures required to protect soil and water quality, both major indicators of ecosystem health.
Terrain analysis tools are important for identification of various components of the geomorphic surface of the landscape, including the geometry of segments of hillslopes, locations of stream reaches within drainage networks, and the morphology of watersheds. Terrain variability is one of the central factors influencing the development and evolution of soils, so the soils developed on different facets of hillslopes differ from each other and from soils developed in terrain depressions or in the floodplains of streams. Combining terrain information with soil and other multi-disciplinary data permits further refinement of existing soil surveys which often contain two or more related types of soils within a single mapping unit. Mapping the distribution of these components and inclusions will permit enhancement of existing soil surveys to a higher degree of resolution. For more information on soil survey enhancement, contact Alan Amen, Soil Scientist, BLM NARSC.
Streams, channels, and hollows form drainages which are organized into drainage networks or linked systems of streams and watersheds usually identified by their order in the network. A network includes streams and watersheds all the way from a major topographic divide to the river delta as it enters the ocean. Processes within any subwatershed or reach within a portion of a network can be modeled independently and as part of a linked watershed system. In this way, it is possible to subdivide and aggregate the effects of various watershed processes (e.g. erosion and sediment yield) throughout the network and calculate their cumulative impact on the landscape within the network. An example of this type of analysis is provided by the watershed data preparation AMLs for the Hydrologic Modeling System (HMS) of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers which will be described in future editions of Resource Notes.
We invite further suggestions as to possible applications of resource analysis tools and models to your own projects. For futher information on the efforts describe above contact:
Jacek Blaszczynski, Physical Scientist, BLM NARSC RS-120, DFC Bldg. 50, Denver, Colorado, (303) 236-5263, email@example.com
Return to Resource Notes Index
Search | Browse | BLM Home | DOI Home | Feedback | Sitemap
Products & Services | NSTC Directory | Organization Chart | S & T Project Review Board | BLM Library | Resource Notes
Air Quality | Engineering | Ecosystem Modeling | GIS | Wildfire
P.O. Box 25047
Bldg. 50, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225-0047
FAX (303) 236-6450
Before continuing, please
read this disclaimer and
Point of contact for technical issues:
You are visitor since xx/xx/xxxx.