BLM Western States Water Laws banner
Navigation bar graphic

Western States Instream Flow Summary

(Download printable PDF version)

State Ownership Authorization and Date New Appropriation Transfers Beneficial Uses
Alaska Public or Private Statute - 1980 Yes, by reservation Yes Protection of Fish and Wildlife habitat; Recreation and parks; Navigation; Sanitation and water quality
Arizona Public or Limited Private1 Statute - 19412 Yes Yes3 Wildlife; Fish; Recreation
California Public or Private Statute - 1991 No4 Yes Wetland habitat; Fish and Wildlife; Recreation; Water Quality
Colorado Colorado Water Conservation Board Statute - 1973 Yes Yes "To preserve the natural environment", but to date only streams supporting fisheries have been protected
Idaho Public or Limited Private5 Statute - 1974 Yes, by reservation Yes, temporary6 Fish and Wildlife habitat; Aquatic life; Recreation; Aesthetic beauty; Navigation; Transportation; Water Quality
Montana Public or Limited Private7 Statute - 1969 Yes, by reservation Yes Fisheries; Water Quality; Other uses that benefit the appropriator, other persons, or the public8
Nevada Public or Private Case Law - 1988 Yes Yes Wildlife; Recreation9
New Mexico10 Public or Private Case Law - 1998 No Yes Fish and Wildlife Habitat; Recreation; (note: instream flow in itself is not a recognized beneficial use)
Oregon Oregon Water Resource Department Statute - 1915 Yes11 Yes Recreation; Conservation; Fish and Wildlife; Ecological Values; Pollution Abatement; Navigation
Utah Divisions of Wildlife Resources and Parks and Recreation Statute - 1986 No Yes Propagation of Fish; Public Recreation; Preservation or Enhancement of the Natural Stream Environment
Wyoming State of Wyoming Statute - 1986 Yes Yes Only Fisheries

Notes:

  1. Ownership in the private sector is limited to public interest groups.
  2. Legislation in 1941 and 1962 established wildlife and fish and then recreation as beneficial uses, but case law in 1976 actually established instream flow appropriations.
  3. Transfers are legally allowed, but have not yet occurred. However, there have been temporary leases.
  4. The State Water Board can require bypass flows for new consumptive uses, but these conditions do not constitute instream flow rights.
  5. Private ownership is only possible on a temporary basis through the water banks or other leases.
  6. Transfers are limited to temporary transfers of storage rights through water banks (see text).
  7. Private holdership can only be established through transfers.
  8. Beneficial use is at the discretion of the DNRC. To date, instream flows have been for fisheries and water quality, but the law does not limit the program to these uses.
  9. Beneficial use is determined on a case-by-case basis so instream flow uses are not necessarily limited to wildlife and recreation.
  10. New Mexico does not have a legislated instream flow program and instream flow is not a recognized beneficial use. Case law has begun their instream flow program (see text).
  11. Only the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Department of Environmental Quality, and the Department of Parks and Recreation may apply for new appropriations for instream flow. Although these departments apply, the right is held in trust by the Water Resources Department.

 

For Information or comments contact:
Eric Hecox
eric_hecox@blm.gov

NSTC Homepage | BLM Homepage