Keeping things connected
The BLM and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service have identified fragmentation as a primary threat to sage-grouse and their habitat. So, current BLM policy addresses the authorization of ROWs in priority sage-grouse habitat.
When processing a ROW application, the BLM works with the applicant on a number of issues, including how best to avoid or minimize loss or fragmentation of sage-grouse habitat. Reasonable possibilities for siting the project outside of priority habitat areas or within a designated ROW corridor are part of the NEPA analysis of the proposal.
:: Avoid :: Minimize :: Mitigate
For large ROWs – for example, those associated with wind and solar energy develoment, pipelines and power transmission lines – the BLM requires measures that minimize impacts to sage-grouse habitat.
In addition to this kind of onsite mitigation, the BLM develops and considers offsite mitigation measures, in cooperation with the applicant and state wildlife managers.
Unless the BLM and state wildlife agency staff determine that such mitigation measures would cumulatively maintain or enhance sage-grouse habitat, the decision on the proposed ROW is sent to a group composed of the appropriate BLM State Director, the Director of the relevant state wildlife agency and a representative of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
If this group cannot agree on appropriate mitigation for the proposed ROW, then the decision goes to the BLM sage-grouse National Policy Team for their review. The Team may also involve the State wildlife agency Director, if appropriate.
If the Policy Team cannot agree, it will seek a final decision from
the BLM Director.
For ROWs less than 1 mile in length or which disturb less than 2 surface acres, the BLM develops mitigation measures in cooperation with the applicant and state wildlife managers that would cumulatively maintain or enhance sage-grouse habitat.