U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Lake Fork flows approximately five miles into the Arkansas River. The Arkansas River does not meet Colorado water quality standards for numerous metals in the reach below the Lake Fork confluence. Historic studies have demonstrated that this reach for up to 16 miles down-gradient continues to be contaminated. The CDOW has inventoried the fisheries habitat and found that while the Lake Fork provides an adequate physical setting for trout habitat, the actual biomass is reflective of a water quality impaired system.
The Sugarloaf mining district that contains a large number of abandoned mines, is the principle contributor to water quality impairment within the Lake Fork of the Arkansas. These mines located at higher elevations in the mining district had drainage tunnels constructed to lower the water levels in the mines. These drainage tunnels now are dumping acidic and metals laden water directly into wetlands and the Lake Fork. A second problem is that dumps, particularly those below the Nelson and Dinero Tunnels are sitting in saturated wet ground and are also contributing acidic metals laden water to the wetlands and stream. The Dinero Tunnel appears to be one of the major contributors of acid mine drainage with the Nelson, Bartlett, and Siwatch tunnels contributing to a lesser extent. The Colorado and Frying Pan Gulches also appear to be principle contributors to the problem.
Water chemistry and aquatic macro-invertebrate data compiled by the Bureau of Reclamation indicates that mine drainage from Sugar Loaf Gulch adversely affects Lake Fork. "Water quality in Sugar Loaf Gulch exceeds aquatic life values for a
During construction, the lower part of the dumps were very loaded up with water that was "wicking" through the dumps and leaching out metals and contamination. There are many thousands of dumps located in Colorado but not all are a problem. In this situation, the location of the dumps in the wetlands was the primary issue and simply moving them to dry ground solves the problem. One of the extra accomplishments at this site was removing about a foot of original ground below the dumps that had become contaminated with heavy metals and including that along with the other dump materials in the repositories.
Work to Date
Prior to construction, the two mine dumps were located within the wetlands area of the Sugarloaf Gulch area. The dump on the upper part of the above picture is termed the south dump and the dump on the lower part of the picture is termed the north dump. The decision was made to fold the north dump out of the wetlands to the area just below and south of the tunnel portal. Once this dump was moved, a repository was developed to house the south dump. This repository location also provided cover material for the north dump.