|
August 20, 1997
The main positive key in this document is the statement on page 8, "There
will be no arbitrary removal of livestock. If removing livestock will not
fix the problem, then livestock will not be removed."
Over grazing by wildlife is a management problem not addressed. Where
damage is due to recreation or wildlife, these activities or species (wild
horses or elk) should be removed, not livestock. Livestock contribute to
the stability of local economy, where as wildlife and recreation often contribute
to the cost of crime enforcement. This is not addressed.
Alternative 4 should not even be considered. This plan could be used
by anti-grazing biased personnel. Even temporary removal of livestock may
put a tremendous burden on the permittee who may have other place to go
with his animals and be forced to sell. Other unused permits must by offered
to ease the burden. Any loss of ranches means loss to the local economy
and loss of winter maintenance of wildlife.
The main problem in the future of BLM will be the availability of unbiased,
knowledgeable and experienced personnel! Common sense and cow sense have
got to be emphasized. Permittees must have the right to appeal any decision
before livestock removal.
We have in the past had experience with Forest personnel who changed
the utilization of a meadow from 60% utilized to 40% utilized after being
show a nearby enclosure by the permittee. Its a good thing he was there.
Another Forest personnel claimed overgrazing in an area where snow had
slowed growth. She had to be shown by the permittee that grass that has
been grazed is chopped off at the tip, not pointed.
Long term past management practices should be documented so that new
BLM personnel can know what has been tried before and whether a permit's
trend is upward or downward.
I highly recommend the article "It may be Utilization, but is it
Management?" by Earl McKinney in the July Rangelands and in the August
Cascade Cattlemen
Alternative 1 is the least objectional. There is still no way a inexperienced
manager could use this Standards and Guidelines without practical knowledge
and local advice.
Since weather is the main variable, changes should be long term and not
as drastic as in Alternative 4.
Sincerely,
Bob Wilson
Carmel Valley, CA
|