|
August 15, 1997
I began visiting the area within the Susanville District (SD)of the Bureau
of Land Management in 1969. Since then I have seen a good portion of the
district. I'm concerned about the management of the public lands (I guess
I'm a part owner), therefore I would like to provide comments on the Rangeland
Health Standards and Guidelines for California and Northwestern Nevada Draft
ElS.
After reading 1.2 Purpose and Need saw no mention of any economic considerations.
It is based on a healthy environment for the benefit of all users of the
public lands. Since this document is for the public benefit the economic
analysis should include an analysis of benefits for all of the public, not
just economic analysis of the benefits to the livestock industry.
1.8 states The viability of native plant and animal communities must
be addressed in the standards and guidelines. It is not adequately addressed.
The only standard that mentions wildlife in the SD is 5. Biodiversity. states
Healthy, productive and diverse populations of native plant and animal species,
including special status species are maintained . Now I wonder if the California
Department of Fish and Game (DFG) or US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFW)
would characterize the native plant and animal species within the SD as
healthy, productive and diverse? Has the BLM asked the DFG? Sage grouse
populations are down, deer populations are lower than they have ever been,
Lahontan cutthroat trout are extinct (originally present in Smoke Creek),
mountain quail are almost gone (small remnant populations on several of
the desert mountain ranges in Lassen County) and willow flycatchers in very
low numbers in a small portion of their historic range.
Alternative 4 represents the best alternative for the general publics
interests. Rapid recovery will benefit all users of the public lands including
livestock producers in the long run.
Surface and groundwater quality in all California BLM Districts should
comply with all California, Tribal and Federal water quality standards
Apparently the Susanville RAC feels that their interests are best served
by polluted wate users if polled would disagree.
Guideline 1 SD. Stubble height requirements are necessary on all habitats
within the Susanville District, not just within the stream-side areas. Ground
nesting birds have been eliminated or greatly reduced by the grazing levels
of the past 100 years. Mountain quail for example have been totally eliminated
from many of the desert mountain ranges in Modoc, Lassen and Washoe Counties.
They are impacted by lack of stubble and excessive browsing of brush has
also eliminated much chokecherry, ceanothus, serviceberry, mahogany, quaking
aspen and bitterbrush.
Guideline 8 SD. Who will determine if grazing use by livestock is providing
for habitat requirements of fish and wildlife? If it is the same body that
has led to the current situation I do not feel comfortable. I suggest this
should be determined by the DFG or USFW.
Guideline 14 SD. 50% utilization of browse species is to much. The brush
species will continue to decline under this grazing pressure.
Appendix 12 left out Special Status Animal Species that no longer occur
on BLM lands within the project area (Lahontan cutthroat trout). Are there
others? This is not appropriate, I would hope that the Appendix be reviewed
for similar omissions and corrected or at least state that extirpated species
are left out and there is no intent to manage habitats for extirpated species.
Rangeland health and livestock grazing are not mutually exclusive. Rangeland
health and heathy. productive and diverse wildlife populations are not mutually
exclusive. Livestock grazing and healthy, productive and diverse wildlife
populations are not mutually exclusive. What is mutually exclusive is the
past and present level of grazing, time of use, and lack of management and
healthy, productive and diverse wildlife populations. Healthy, productive
and diverse wildlife populations are an economic asset to the local state
and national economy. Now go do your lob correctly and develop Standards
and Guidelines that will protect the public interest.
Sincerely,
Jack Booth
Ukiah,CA
|